Living in the USA or in any highly industrialized country,
we are insulated from daily, or even occasional, contact with people of
significantly different cultures. Americans, whether from the Deep South or
upstate New York, and whether black, white, or Hispanic, share similar
customs. We often assume simply because
we do certain things in our everyday lives, other human beings do them too –
even if they are people of a completely different race and culture.
Growing up in South
Africa from the age of 12, I was aware of many differences between the customs and cultures of white (or European) and black
(African) people. It was only when I
moved to Rhodesia (Zimbabwe) in 1967 that I became much more aware of the
differences. I left behind a country where the leaders tried very hard to keep
the races separate. “Apartheid” was in
full gear in South Africa in those times. Everything was segregated. There were many occupations that blacks were
not permitted to perform. For example,
you never saw black truck or bus drivers. There were no black tellers in banks
or in post offices. Separate “homelands” were designated for blacks and so
opportunities for that race in the major cities were limited to menial or
labor-intensive jobs.
The situation and
status of blacks in Rhodesia was completely different. During my first visit to that country in 1966
I was surprised to see blacks in just about every occupation. Front desk hotel
staff, bank tellers, salesmen, and mid to upper management positions in
government agencies were often filled by indigenous Africans. I joined a major
packaging manufacturer in 1971 and worked with very talented staff in sales,
production and accounting positions. Working with these guys over the years I
got to know a little bit about their traditional cultures, how they had moved
to a more “westernized” culture, and some of the problems this had created for
them. As much as a man may have educated himself and moved away from the
village to become integrated into the new economic and technological
environment of “western” society, there was still a powerful commitment to the
family and culture he left behind.
In a country like
Zimbabwe, the significant cultural differences between races could easily lead
to misunderstandings over the simplest everyday issues. As both races were
dependent on each other, it was important to learn as much about one another as
possible. Much of the following
narrative is taken from a book that I acquired in 1970 and which was very
helpful to me in understanding the customs of the two predominant African
tribes living in Zimbabwe. The book is titled “The Man - and His Ways.” It was distributed
by the Rhodesian Ministry of Information, Immigration and Tourism. It was not
intended to be a text book on the beliefs and customs of the African people,
but it was recommended as a general introduction to describe the differences
between rural African beliefs and those of white Rhodesians in the 1970s.
There are two main
African tribes in the country, the AmaNdebele and the Mashona. The Mashona
probably arrived in the area about 1,000 years ago. Before the Mashona the
country was widely, but sparsely, populated by the small statured Bushman who
had not advanced beyond the Stone Age. The Bushman would, over time, be
displaced westwards to the remote vastness of the Kalahari. In the 1830s the
AmaNdebele, an offshoot of the warrior Zulu nation of southeastern South Africa
(now KwaZulu-Natal) arrived in the south west of the country and began to
ravage and plunder the numerous Mashona tribal groups which lived in disunity
in the remainder of the country. All of these people had migrated from North
Africa over a long period of time, for well over 1,000 years. Their long
journey was dictated by the seasons, by tribal conflict, and by need. Land was
abundant and there was no urge to preserve its abundant resources.
A tribe would
settle in an area, build huts from readily available materials (poles and
thatch) and cultivate small patches of crop such as millet. This, together with
meat from the hunt, wild honey, fruits, roots and fish, formed the basis of
their diet. This was entirely a “subsistence” economy. Storage was difficult so
in years of good rains, there was abundance and nothing was kept against the
likelihood of drought the next year. The future, in these circumstances, could
look after itself.
Each member of the
tribe was wholly dependent upon the fellow members of their tribe and
family. They were all surrounded by
danger and had no means of protection, apart from that of the community. There
was no room for individuality and the wealth of a tribe was measured in
people and in cattle, with the strongest preying upon the weakest. Of course,
over time, laws and customs became vital to regulating the affairs of the
tribes and these would be applied by the tribal chiefs. These customs and laws
were handed down by word of mouth, as the tribes had no form of writing. Most of these customs were recognized in the courts
of Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) after the late 1800s when the country was settled by
westerners.
Even though there
are two main African tribes in Zimbabwe, the numbers of different tribal groups
within these two tribes are many, so it is easy to assume that the custom in
one village will be similar in villages nearby.
There is considerable variation among customs although overall the
fundamental beliefs will be the same throughout the country. For example the
way that weddings are arranged will differ widely from village to village, whereas
the practice of “lobolo” or bride price is concerned, this will fundamentally
be the same everywhere.
Of course African
law, and thinking, has been subjected to European influence for over 100 years.
For example, many “modern” African people today will choose to be married in
the church and will have one partner according to Christian beliefs. Cash has replaced the hoe as a token and many
other new ideas have been accepted.
Unlike Europeans,
the more traditional African does not regard himself as an individual distinct
from the rest of his tribal group. He
feels himself to be part of a unit, be it tribe or family and to that unit he
owes certain obligations in exchange for which he derives many benefits. His family, or tribal group, is extended to
include the spirits of the departed and they have a great influence on his
actions and his thinking. The solid foundation of any tribal group is the ordinary
family. The head of the family has certain
responsibilities, the most importance being to maintain family unity. He can’t
achieve this without consultation, so all matters affecting his small group are
thoroughly discussed with the family, and his decision is a family affair based
on a consensus of opinion. In important
matters, he consults the spirits of past members, and seeks their guidance.
During generations
of struggle and survival the traditional African has acquired a passive
fatalism. Misfortune is often regarded
as due to witchcraft or is an expression of displeasure by the spirits. There was nothing a person could do to avoid
it so he gave little or no thought to tomorrow.
He conserved his energies and blamed everything bad on something else. Even
today, we might hear the excuse “I was failed by the examination” rather than “I
failed!”
The African loves
laughter. His needs are few and simple
and when they are satisfied he is inclined to sit back, for time, he believes,
is given to everyone for nothing. It has
no value so why hurry to do today what can be postponed until tomorrow? Land
and water have also been put here for his use, so they, like time, can be wasted. Let tomorrow look after itself!
So how do the
distinctly different beliefs of the African and the European merge in a third
world country in which the future of each is so dependent on the other? Just as
the rural, and traditional, African man must learn the customs of the European,
so must the European learn the background of the African and treat him with
respect, patience and courtesy. Those
whose missionary work exposed them directly to the most basic tribal beliefs
were daily confronted by a need for patience. A mother who was diagnosed with a
condition requiring a prescription for antibiotics, for example, would be instructed
to take one daily for two weeks. Why not, she would reason, take them all at
once? Surely that would be the most effective way to be cured.
_________________________________
In Part 2 of
this narrative I will write about the traditional African man, his spirits, his
wives and children and his relationship to the land.
I've surfed the net more than three hours today, and your blog was the coolest of all. Thanks a lot, it is really useful to me
ReplyDeleteI really appreciated your comment. Nice to know it might have been enjoyed.
Delete